Having listened to this, it’s sounds like the base assumption is that humans are fundamentally separate and cannot ever really know what is happening for another. David Bohm believed there was a foundation below that of singular wholeness from which we all make our unique cognitive maps. I guess it depends on what you believe’ is the ‘base’ – whether you have ever experienced oneness with existence WITH another human being. Bryan Katie has a oneness view, but also claims ‘no two human beings have ever met’. I think coming down strongly in one view (I think there were a couple of certain and almost dismissive ‘well course, xyz can’t be the case’s in this video) .. that’s the only bits i would question … who knows … maybe we can know what the other is experiencing in a relative sense – like the shared ‘false memory’ in your other post – or Carl Jung’s collective unconscious – places and ways to connect that do not expressly need to be mediated through the physical world. The three principles guys say that everyone has their OWN interpretation system – who’s to say the interpretation systems aren’t in part ‘shared resources’ across many humans, like an online translation programme, the engine seems like it with everyone’s phone because they are translating different things, but actually it sits on a shared server somewhere else .. who’s to say reality (the internet etc.) are not progressively closer outside manifestations of internal no-localised structures … if fact, in a way, how can it not be?
Leo Searle
9 January 2017
Both are true. Yes, our thoughts create our emotional response as Judy says. And yes, communication across hundreds, even thousands of miles through clairyonce, telepathy and direct soul-to-soul communion are also true.
Different levels of reality, that’s all.
This comes from my direct experience, not theory, philosophy or something I read.
Blessings to all.
Peter John Hirst
10 January 2017
I’m inclined to agree with Leo. The Three Principles teaches us that we all create and experience our own reality via Thought. We are all also powered by the same source so are in that way connected. We are all both receivers and transmitters so it is feasible that we can communicate remotely.
Comments from original on judyrees.co.uk
Anand
4 January 2017
Having listened to this, it’s sounds like the base assumption is that humans are fundamentally separate and cannot ever really know what is happening for another. David Bohm believed there was a foundation below that of singular wholeness from which we all make our unique cognitive maps. I guess it depends on what you believe’ is the ‘base’ – whether you have ever experienced oneness with existence WITH another human being. Bryan Katie has a oneness view, but also claims ‘no two human beings have ever met’. I think coming down strongly in one view (I think there were a couple of certain and almost dismissive ‘well course, xyz can’t be the case’s in this video) .. that’s the only bits i would question … who knows … maybe we can know what the other is experiencing in a relative sense – like the shared ‘false memory’ in your other post – or Carl Jung’s collective unconscious – places and ways to connect that do not expressly need to be mediated through the physical world. The three principles guys say that everyone has their OWN interpretation system – who’s to say the interpretation systems aren’t in part ‘shared resources’ across many humans, like an online translation programme, the engine seems like it with everyone’s phone because they are translating different things, but actually it sits on a shared server somewhere else .. who’s to say reality (the internet etc.) are not progressively closer outside manifestations of internal no-localised structures … if fact, in a way, how can it not be?
Leo Searle
9 January 2017
Both are true. Yes, our thoughts create our emotional response as Judy says. And yes, communication across hundreds, even thousands of miles through clairyonce, telepathy and direct soul-to-soul communion are also true.
Different levels of reality, that’s all.
This comes from my direct experience, not theory, philosophy or something I read.
Blessings to all.
Peter John Hirst
10 January 2017
I’m inclined to agree with Leo. The Three Principles teaches us that we all create and experience our own reality via Thought. We are all also powered by the same source so are in that way connected. We are all both receivers and transmitters so it is feasible that we can communicate remotely.